Skip to content
VerifiedPeptides
Healing & Recovery

Urodilatin

Also known as: Ularitide · ANP(95-126) · CDD/ANP-95-126

Quick answer

Urodilatin is a 32-amino-acid natriuretic peptide produced locally within the kidney's distal tubule cells, a distinct processing product of the same precursor that generates atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP). Its synthetic form, ularitide, was tested in a large Phase III trial (TRUE-AHF, over 2,100 patients) for acute heart failure — one of the largest, best-documented negative clinical trial outcomes for any compound in this catalog: it produced favorable short-term effects but did not reduce cardiovascular mortality. No formulation has FDA approval. Research-grade material sold here is a separate product intended solely for laboratory research.

What is Urodilatin?

Urodilatin was first isolated and structurally characterized from human urine in 1988 by Schulz-Knappe, Forssmann, and colleagues (Klinische Wochenschrift, 1988), who identified it as a distinct 32-amino-acid natriuretic peptide produced locally within kidney distal tubule cells — a genuinely separate processing product of the same precursor (pro-ANP) that also generates circulating atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP), but cleaved at a different site to yield a peptide with four additional N-terminal residues (Thr-Ala-Pro-Arg) compared to ANP itself.

Chemically, urodilatin has molecular formula C145H234N52O44S3, molecular weight approximately 3,506 g/mol, CAS number 115966-23-9, PubChem CID 405116874. Its sequence contains an internal disulfide bridge between cysteine residues 11 and 27, forming the same characteristic ring structure shared across the natriuretic peptide family (including Nesiritide/BNP, also built on this site).

At Verified Peptides, we want to note that urodilatin's synthetic pharmaceutical form was developed under the International Nonproprietary Name (INN) ularitide, and essentially all of the substantial clinical trial literature on this peptide uses that name. We use "Urodilatin" and "ularitide" interchangeably in this profile to reflect how the compound is discussed across both its physiological-discovery literature (which uses urodilatin) and its clinical-development literature (which uses ularitide).

Urodilatin's physiological role was uncovered through a genuinely distinctive research approach: rather than being identified through blood-based hormone assays as most circulating peptide hormones are, it was specifically isolated from human urine, reflecting the research hypothesis (later confirmed) that the kidney itself was locally producing a natriuretic peptide distinct from what circulated in blood, rather than simply filtering and concentrating blood-borne ANP. This urine-based discovery approach is part of why urodilatin's local, renal-specific role took longer to be appreciated than the more straightforward, blood-based discovery of ANP and BNP.

Key Benefits & Mechanisms

Mechanism of action

Urodilatin binds the same natriuretic peptide receptor A (NPR-A)/particulate guanylyl cyclase/cyclic GMP signaling pathway used by ANP and BNP, producing vasodilation, natriuresis, and diuresis. What distinguishes urodilatin mechanistically from circulating ANP and BNP is its local site of production and action: rather than being synthesized in cardiac tissue and circulating systemically, urodilatin is produced directly within kidney distal tubule cells and acts locally on the renal tubule, giving it a paracrine (local, tissue-level) signaling role distinct from the endocrine (whole-body circulating hormone) role of ANP and BNP.

A key pharmacological advantage proposed for urodilatin over circulating natriuretic peptides is its relative resistance to degradation by neutral endopeptidase (NEP), an enzyme that rapidly breaks down ANP and BNP in peripheral tissue. This relative NEP resistance was part of the original therapeutic rationale for developing ularitide (synthetic urodilatin) as an intravenous heart failure treatment — the hypothesis being that a peptide naturally adapted to function in the NEP-rich renal environment might retain more potent, sustained natriuretic activity than the circulating natriuretic peptides when administered systemically.

An early Phase II double-blind, placebo-controlled, ascending-dose trial (Mitrovic et al., American Heart Journal, 2005, PMID 16338265) in patients with decompensated chronic heart failure reported favorable hemodynamic and clinical effects, supporting advancement to larger trials.

Urodilatin's proposed clinical advantage over nesiritide specifically centered on this NEP-resistance property: because nesiritide (recombinant BNP) is a substrate for neutral endopeptidase and is rapidly cleared, researchers hypothesized that urodilatin's greater NEP resistance might provide a more sustained or more potent natriuretic effect at an equivalent dose, or fewer of the specific pharmacokinetic drawbacks associated with nesiritide's clearance profile. This was a genuine, mechanistically grounded rationale for why a second natriuretic-peptide-family drug candidate was worth developing despite nesiritide already existing on the market.

Research Summary

At Verified Peptides, we think ularitide's clinical development history is one of the most instructive, well-documented negative outcomes in this entire catalog, and we want to describe it with the same honesty we apply to compounds with more favorable results. Following encouraging Phase I/II data (including PMID 16338265), ularitide advanced to TRUE-AHF, a large randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled Phase III trial (Packer et al., New England Journal of Medicine, 2017, PMID 28402745) that enrolled 2,157 patients with acute heart failure — a genuinely large, well-powered trial by the standards of heart failure drug development, and one of the largest trials behind any compound in this catalog.

The results were unambiguous: ularitide produced favorable acute physiological effects (without increasing cardiac troponin levels, addressing a specific safety concern that had been raised about aggressive vasodilator therapy in heart failure), but the 48-hour infusion did not improve the trial's clinical composite endpoint, and critically, did not reduce long-term cardiovascular mortality — 21.7% of ularitide-treated patients died from cardiovascular causes over follow-up compared to 21.0% of placebo patients (hazard ratio 1.03, 96% CI 0.85-1.25, p=0.75), a result indistinguishable from no effect at all on the outcome that mattered most.

We want to be direct about what this means: TRUE-AHF is a genuine, well-designed, adequately powered negative trial, not an ambiguous or underpowered one. It represents one of several prominent acute heart failure drug trials from this general era (alongside nesiritide's more complicated regulatory history, also built on this site) that found short-term hemodynamic improvement did not translate into the long-term mortality benefit researchers had hoped for — a broader, field-wide lesson about the gap between improving how a heart failure patient feels and functions acutely versus improving how long they live, which the natriuretic peptide field has had to reckon with across multiple compounds.

No ularitide/urodilatin formulation has received FDA approval, and clinical development for acute heart failure has not continued following the TRUE-AHF result. At Verified Peptides, we sell research-grade Urodilatin exclusively for laboratory research, and we think its combination of a well-characterized distinct physiological role (local renal natriuretic signaling) and a large, honestly negative Phase III trial makes it a valuable comparison point for researchers studying why acute hemodynamic improvement in heart failure has proven so difficult to translate into mortality benefit.

Common Stacks

Urodilatin and Nesiritide At Verified Peptides, we see Urodilatin and Nesiritide as the two most directly comparable compounds in this catalog's cardiovascular/natriuretic peptide cluster — both are natriuretic peptide family members acting through natriuretic peptide receptor A, both were developed as acute heart failure therapies, and both have real, large-scale clinical trial data. Nesiritide is FDA-approved (though with its own well-documented safety controversy), while ularitide's Phase III trial (TRUE-AHF) was a clear negative result. Researchers studying the natriuretic peptide family's translation from mechanism to clinical outcome may find this direct within-family comparison particularly instructive. Urodilatin and Angiotensin(1-7) At Verified Peptides, we note that Urodilatin and Angiotensin(1-7) both belong to counter-regulatory hormone systems that oppose pathological fluid retention and vasoconstriction, though through entirely separate receptors (NPR-A/cGMP for urodilatin, Mas receptor for Angiotensin(1-7)). Researchers studying the broader landscape of endogenous counter-regulatory cardiovascular/renal peptide systems may find this pairing useful for comparing renal-local (urodilatin) versus more systemic (Angiotensin(1-7)) counter-regulatory signaling. Urodilatin and Apelin-13 At Verified Peptides, we note that Urodilatin and Apelin-13 share a similar clinical development arc worth comparing directly: both showed genuinely favorable acute hemodynamic effects in heart failure research (vasodilation, improved cardiac performance measures) but face distinct practical limitations to standalone drug development — ularitide's large Phase III trial found no mortality benefit despite short-term physiological improvement, while apelin-13's poor plasma stability has limited its own path to becoming a standalone approved therapy. Researchers studying acute heart failure hemodynamic-support strategies broadly may find this pairing instructive for understanding different reasons promising acute cardiovascular peptides have struggled to become established heart failure drugs.

Lesser-Known Facts About Urodilatin

Urodilatin's local, paracrine renal production and action is a genuinely distinctive feature within the natriuretic peptide family: rather than being released into general circulation from cardiac tissue like ANP and BNP, it is synthesized within the kidney's distal tubule and is thought to act locally on adjacent tubular segments, meaning circulating blood levels of urodilatin do not necessarily reflect its actual local concentration or activity at its site of action — an important methodological consideration for any research attempting to measure or correlate urodilatin levels with its physiological effects.

Ularitide (synthetic urodilatin) reached a very substantial stage of clinical development — a completed, adequately powered Phase III trial with over 2,100 randomized patients — placing it among a small number of compounds in this entire catalog whose clinical failure is documented at this scale of evidence, rather than being an early-phase or small-trial result. This scale of negative data is, in its own way, more informative than a small or ambiguous trial would be, since it substantially rules out anything but a very small clinical benefit.

TRUE-AHF's finding that ularitide did not increase cardiac troponin levels addressed a specific mechanistic safety concern that had been raised about aggressive vasodilator therapy in acute heart failure — the hypothesis that excessive blood pressure reduction could reduce coronary perfusion and cause subclinical cardiac injury. Ruling this out, even in a trial that ultimately found no mortality benefit, is itself a meaningful piece of safety information for the broader field studying vasodilator strategies in acute heart failure.

The broader pattern across nesiritide, ularitide, and other acute heart failure vasodilator/natriuretic peptide candidates tested in large trials during the 2000s-2010s — favorable short-term hemodynamic and symptomatic effects that failed to translate into improved long-term survival — has become an important, field-shaping lesson in heart failure drug development, prompting researchers to reconsider what short-term physiological endpoints reliably predict genuine long-term clinical benefit.

Purity & Sourcing Considerations

At Verified Peptides, we require independent third-party HPLC purity testing and mass spectrometry identity confirmation for every batch of research-grade Urodilatin we offer, with a Certificate of Analysis (COA) available for each lot. As a 32-residue peptide with an internal disulfide-bonded ring structure shared with the broader natriuretic peptide family, correct folding and disulfide bond formation are essential to biological activity, making identity confirmation beyond simple amino acid composition analysis particularly important.

We source exclusively from manufacturers operating under Good Manufacturing Practice (GMP)-aligned quality systems, and every lot is independently verified rather than accepted solely on a supplier's internal documentation. Researchers should always request and review the specific COA for the lot they receive, confirming purity percentage, molecular identity, and correct disulfide bond formation where analytically verifiable.

Storage & Stability

Lyophilized Urodilatin is stable when stored at -20°C, protected from light and moisture, and researchers can generally expect the unreconstituted peptide to maintain integrity over an extended period under these conditions. At Verified Peptides, we ship lyophilized peptide with appropriate cold-chain packaging to preserve stability in transit.

Once reconstituted, Urodilatin solution should be stored refrigerated at 2–8°C and used within the timeframe indicated on the product's documentation. Because urodilatin's biological activity depends on maintaining its internal disulfide-bonded ring structure, researchers should avoid conditions such as reducing agents or repeated freeze-thaw cycling that could disrupt this structure and compromise activity.

Researchers should follow the specific storage guidance provided with each lot's documentation to preserve sample validity, and avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles of reconstituted material.

Frequently asked questions about Urodilatin

What is Urodilatin and how is it different from ANP and BNP?

Urodilatin is a 32-amino-acid natriuretic peptide produced locally within kidney distal tubule cells, generated from the same precursor as ANP but cleaved differently to include 4 extra N-terminal residues. Unlike circulating ANP and BNP, urodilatin acts locally (paracrine) within the kidney rather than as a systemic circulating hormone, and is relatively resistant to degradation by neutral endopeptidase.

What is ularitide and how does it relate to Urodilatin?

Ularitide is the International Nonproprietary Name (INN) for synthetic urodilatin developed as a pharmaceutical candidate. Essentially all clinical trial literature on this peptide uses the name ularitide, while the physiological discovery literature uses urodilatin — they refer to the same molecule.

What happened in the TRUE-AHF clinical trial?

TRUE-AHF (PMID 28402745) was a large, randomized, double-blind Phase III trial of 2,157 acute heart failure patients. Ularitide produced favorable short-term physiological effects without increasing cardiac troponin, but did not improve the clinical composite endpoint or reduce long-term cardiovascular mortality (21.7% vs. 21.0% in placebo, p=0.75) — a clear, well-powered negative result.

Is Urodilatin/Ularitide FDA approved?

No. Despite reaching a large Phase III trial, ularitide did not demonstrate a mortality benefit, and clinical development for acute heart failure has not continued. No formulation has received FDA approval.

Why did earlier trials look more promising than TRUE-AHF turned out to be?

Earlier Phase I/II trials, including a 2005 ascending-dose study (PMID 16338265), measured hemodynamic and short-term clinical improvements, which were genuinely favorable. TRUE-AHF was designed specifically to test whether these short-term benefits translated into reduced long-term cardiovascular mortality in a much larger population, and found they did not — illustrating why large, mortality-focused trials are necessary even after positive smaller studies.

How does Urodilatin compare to Nesiritide?

Both are natriuretic peptide family members acting through the same NPR-A/cGMP pathway and were developed for acute heart failure. Nesiritide (recombinant BNP) achieved FDA approval, though with its own well-documented safety controversy, while ularitide's large Phase III trial found no mortality benefit, representing two different regulatory and evidentiary outcomes within the same peptide family.

Why is Urodilatin's local production in the kidney significant for research?

Because urodilatin acts locally (paracrine) within the kidney rather than circulating systemically, blood levels do not necessarily reflect its actual concentration or activity at its site of action — an important consideration for researchers designing experiments that attempt to measure or correlate urodilatin levels with physiological effects.

What administration route was used in Urodilatin/Ularitide clinical trials?

The TRUE-AHF trial used a 48-hour continuous intravenous infusion. This describes methodology used in published clinical research, not usage instructions — Verified Peptides does not provide dosing guidance for human or animal administration.

Why was Urodilatin developed when Nesiritide already existed as an approved drug?

Urodilatin's relative resistance to degradation by neutral endopeptidase (NEP), an enzyme that rapidly breaks down nesiritide (BNP), provided a genuine mechanistic rationale for testing whether it might offer a more sustained or potent natriuretic effect, or avoid specific pharmacokinetic drawbacks associated with nesiritide's rapid clearance. This hypothesis motivated its clinical development despite an existing approved natriuretic peptide drug already being on the market.

Legal & research status: Urodilatin (ularitide) has not been approved by the FDA, EMA, or any other regulatory body for any indication. Its Phase III clinical trial (TRUE-AHF) for acute heart failure found no mortality benefit, and clinical development has not continued. Material sold as a research peptide is offered strictly for laboratory and research use, not for human consumption or therapeutic use.

Research use only All content is provided for informational and research purposes only and is not medical advice. Peptides referenced are sold and discussed for laboratory and research use only, not for human consumption. Consult a licensed physician before making any health decision.